N
the movies, school principals are generally portrayed in two distinct
categories.
There is the baseball-bat-toting disciplinarian, evoked by Morgan Freeman
(playing the real-life New Jersey high school principal Joe Clark) in
the 1989 movie "Lean on Me." And there is the buffoon forever running
a step behind his students, epitomized by the fictional Ed Rooney (played
by the character actor Jeffrey Jones) as he pursues the chronic truant
Ferris Bueller.
But the job has always been far less colorful than Hollywood would lead
us to believe. And it has never been harder on the people in it, a circumstance
that helps explain a national shortage that has left some states struggling
to find a permanent principal for one of every five schools.
In December, the New York City schools chancellor, Joel I. Klein, followed
the lead of educators in Boston, Providence and elsewhere by announcing
a corporate-style principal training and incentive program. Those New
York City principals who agree to work in failing schools for three years
could earn $75,000 in bonus pay, while a farm team of rookie principals
is to be developed partly by having them shadow veterans in a leadership
academy.
Anyone considering such work would do well to consult a recent graduate
of a similar program, someone like Teri Schrader, who is in her second
year as principal of the Francis W. Parker Charter Essential School in
Devens, Mass., northwest of Boston. Depending on the time of day, Ms.
Schrader can be rallying her 350 middle- and high-school students before
do-or-die standardized tests, combing Massachusetts' liability codes to
assess Parker's potential exposure in a given case, or buttonholing politicians
in an effort to extend the life of her experimental seven-year-old public
school, which has an annual budget of nearly $2 million.
"I'm constantly likening it to being a theater director," said Ms. Schrader,
42, who as a drama teacher previously directed perhaps 60 productions
at schools in Hartford and suburban Massachusetts. "You're utterly accountable,
but you're not the one on stage. It's really like directing theater surrounded
by a ring of fire."
In the summer of 2000, after nearly two decades teaching drama and art,
most recently at Parker, Ms. Schrader decided to enroll in what her family
refers to as "principal college." She chose the Greater Boston Principal
Residency Network, a part-time one-year training program based partly
at Northeastern University. The program follows a medical school "residency"
model by placing 10 aspiring principals each year in a mentoring relationship
with a veteran principal.
Working under those veterans, the rookies gain hands-on experience and
are eventually expected to graduate to their own principalships.
During her apprenticeship, Ms. Schrader, shadowing the principal at
Parker, Greg Sinner, embarked on a daunting project: deciding how much
the school's teachers and other employees, 62 staff members in all, would
be paid. As a charter school exempt from union rules, Parker had no compensation
policy during its first five years, and that meant that some junior members
of the staff were paid more than veterans.
The arguments were bitter, as some veterans argued for a traditional
"step system" in which salaries would rise in automatic increments. Others
wanted raises tied exclusively to teachers' performance.
Ms. Schrader was inclined to agree with the latter, until her mentor,
Mr. Sinner, who had spent 30 years as a principal in Illinois, talked
her down. He explained that far more seasoned administrators than she
had failed in other districts to define how a teacher's performance would
be judged — no one at Parker, for example, wanted to link teacher pay
to students' test scores — and that a fair system linking wages to the
subtle work of instruction would most likely be elusive.
"He was the oldest person in the room," Ms. Schrader said of Mr. Sinner,
then in his 60's. "He was really good at asking big questions."
In the end, a committee led by Ms. Schrader and counseled by Mr. Sinner
forged a compromise: it created three experience-based categories of teacher
salaries, and, within each level, a range of increases to be awarded by
the principal, partly on the basis of observation in the classroom.
"The conversations where I have been able to inform these teachers of
their adjustments," Ms. Schrader wrote in a paper to her colleagues in
the principal training program, "have been among the most joyous and unforgettable
of my career."
At the end of that school year, when Mr. Sinner retired, the job of
principal was Ms. Schrader's. In the 18 months since, she has had few
school days that have lasted less than 12 hours.
"I think outsiders function on a movie model of what a school principal
is," she said. "I don't think people have a clue how much you love your
kids and how hard the work is."